The foremost need of Public Servants is to know Christ. This is why Capitol Ministries is focused on changing hearts by sharing the gospel. Good legislation is important, but men and women can hardly be expected to make policies in accordance with sound, biblically based principles if they are at odds with the author of Scripture. Only the gospel has the efficacy to change a heart. We believe that foremost in the Capital Community is the objective of evangelizing and discipling political leaders. We need more disciplers!
Consider whether there a biblical basis or calling to minister to political leaders. If so, how important is this in the mind of God? I think you may be in for a surprise. Read on, my friend!
There is a biblical mandate that addresses whether modern mission include Public Servants! This study is intended to show you that truth as it runs throughout the whole of the Bible ó and help you to build a conviction regarding it.
As a Public Servant, this study should fascinate you! In that political leaders are essential to the Great Commission, it follows that you must be heavily involved in its fulfillment! The best way to reach other public servants with the Gospel of Jesus Christ is through evangelistic efforts! So, letís explore and closely examine this biblical mandate to reach political leaders with the gospel.
The following three portions of the New Testament provide the best initial understanding of this missiological emphasis that runs throughout the Word of God.
First of all, then, I urge that entreaties and prayers, petitions and thanksgivings, be made on behalf of all men, for kings and all who are in authority, in order that we may lead a tranquil and quiet life in all godliness and dignity. This is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.
The Apostle Paul urges Timothy to pray evangelistically, not only for all men in general, but specifically for kings and all who are in authority. Very importantly, verse 1 begins, I urge. These English words come from the original Greek language: parakalo which is a compound word comprised of the preposition para and the verb kaleo. Para means ìto come alongsideî while kaleo means ìto call.î Together, parakalo is an emphatic verb that means ìto call alongside.î It is in the first-person singular: I urge [you Timothy].
Paul heightens this command with first of all, or proton, to indicate its priority (proton is used to signify first in priority rather than sequence). In other words, Paul wanted Timothy to join him in praying evangelistically for kings and those in authority. (Youíll notice that the last portion of this passage, verse 4, indicates the aforementioned command to pray is all to be taken in the context of evangelism.)
What we see here is not an afterthought in Paulís mind. Concern for political leaders was an emphasis that ran throughout his ministry and was born in his Damascus Road conversion. Notice this in the Acts 9:15 passage that follows:
But the Lord said to him, ìGo, for he is a chosen instrument of Mine, to bear My name before the Gentiles and kings and the sons of Israel.î
From the inception of Paulís calling, the Lord revealed to Ananias ( Jesusí surrogate messenger to Paul, who was at that time known as Saul, in the preceding portion of this Acts 9 passage) that Paul would be His chosen instrument Ö to bear [His] name before the Gentiles and kings and the sons of Israel.
IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT KINGS WERE ONE OF THE SPECIFIC PEOPLE-GROUPS THAT GOD CALLED PAUL TO EVANGELIZE
There were many cities in the Roman Empire that had not heard the gospel. So, the curious question should be asked, how did Paul decide where he would next travel? Certainly, there were many factors he considered, but one of those was the presence of political leaders: You will see below that his calling informed his travels, i.e. what cities he would go to in order to establish churches. It is very important to get this connection: The vast majority of cities Paul chose to visit stemmed from his Acts 9:15 calling. Note that those cities were capital cities in the Roman Empire. Note the following in this regard:
Paul ministered to Jews and Gentiles, but it is important to not overlook that in this passage Paul was also called to be a missionary to evangelize kings. Thatís why he went to these capital cities ó as we shall see next.
In that regard:
OF THE THIRTEEN INDIVIDUAL CONVERSIONS RECORDED BY AUTHOR LUKE IN THE BOOK OF ACTS, SEVEN ARE POLITICALLY RELATED PEOPLE
This emphasis of reaching governing leaders is vividly illustrated in the 28-chapter narrative. It is insightful to note that Luke is writing Acts for Theophilus (cf. Acts 1:1). In that he calls him most excellent, a title used to address governors (cf. Acts 23:26; 24:3; 26:25). It is quite possible that Luke is writing this account, as well as the Gospel of Luke (cf. Luke 1:3) for the purpose of persuading a government leader to come to faith in Christ. This would explain why over one-half of the individual conversion accounts recorded in the book of Acts involve politically related people. Lukeís purpose could be either to relate to Theophilus that other governmental leaders have come to Christ, or to illustrate the fulfillment of Paulís call in Acts 9:15, if not both. Note the common vocation amongst the following conversions:
Paulís Acts 9:15 calling gives insight as to why he desired to visit Rome, and subsequently even travel as far as Spain. In Acts 23:11 the Lord revealed to Paul that he must testify of Him in Rome: ìTake courage; for as you have solemnly witnessed to My cause at Jerusalem, so you must witness at Rome also.î
The Apostle longed to fellowship with the church in Rome (cf. Romans 1:10- 12), but he had at least one other reason for making the voyage: evangelism. This is evident from Acts 27:24 where the Lord adds that Paul ìmust stand before Caesar.î Therefore, out of obedience to his calling, Paul was compelled to take the gospel to Caesar. History evidences that Caesar did not get saved, but Philippians 4:22 indicates that Paul had been used by God in a powerful way in the emperorís palace: All the saints greet you, especially those of Caesarís household.
Paul was a man governed by the vivid memory of his conversion as recorded in Acts 9 ó and the specificity of his calling to reach the leaders of the world with the gospel.
AS A POLITICAL LEADER, YOU ARE SPECIFICALLY QUALIFIED TO FOLLOW IN PAULíS CALLING
It is reasonable to assume Paulís mission to Spain somehow aligned with his calling, and it did. Spain was a mineral-rich colony on the westernmost extent of the Empire. It had a population of Jews and Gentiles who hadnít heard the gospel.
Did Spain have a contingency of political leaders? Yes. The orator Quintilian, the writer Martial, and the statesman Seneca resided there. The Roman emperors Trajan and Hadrian were born there as well. According to Clement of Rome (writing in A.D. 95), Paul reached Spain and ìgave his testimony before the rulers.î
The Apostle labored to reach political leaders with the gospel. His deep concern for their salvation perhaps explains why he gave such an emphatic mandate to Timothy in the previously cited passage (1Timothy 2:1-4). They serve as bookends to the emphasis in and of the ministry life of Paul. To recap, Paul instructed Timothy to pray for the salvation of Romeís political leaders. The same principle applies for all believers today: Christians should desire to see their political leaders come to know Christ. In fact:
FROM GENESIS TO REVELATION, GODíS PEOPLE PURSUE AN EVANGELISTIC MINISTRY TO POLITICAL LEADERS IN FOREIGN NATIONS
This consuming evangelistic zeal encompassed Paulís life after his Damascus Road conversion. The same emphasis exists throughout in Scripture.
In addition to the Apostle Paul, the Apostle Peter, too exemplified this emphasis of ministry in the New Testament. Moving forward from the Church Age, after the close of the Church Age, tribulation saints will have a ministry to unbelieving kings.
Looking the other way in the Bible, in the Old Testament nation of Israel, Godís chosen people under the Old Covenant, was meant to be a beacon, a representative of Yahwehís glory, shining forth unto all the Gentile nations of the world. And in this regard, even more specifically, the nation Israel was meant by God to testify of God to the political leaders in those Gentile nations! We will see this in some select passages that follow.
The point is this: the ministry of reaching political leaders runs prominently throughout all of Scripture. Summarily states one of Godís choice servants in this regard, I will also speak of your testimonies before Kings and shall not be ashamed (Psalm 119:46).
The proposition that today there exists a missing mandate in modern missions (that of reaching political leaders as a first priority) can be demonstrated from the following epochs of biblical revela≠tion. These passages indicate an historic thread of emphasis near to the heart of God that is woefully underemphasized in todayís Christian Missiology.
God promised Abraham he would one day receive land, have numerous descendants, and be blessed by God (cf. Genesis 12:1-3). Four centuries passed as Abrahamís descendants grew from one family into 12 tribes and finally into the nation Israel. The Lord called them out of the world to be His ìown possession,î ìa kingdom of priests and a holy nationî (Exodus 19:5-6). Extrinsically, Israel was called to proclaim the excellencies of God to all the surrounding nations.
God intended for His people to become a light to the Gentile nations in a general sense; and more specifically, He expected His people to be a light to the leaders of those nations. Isaiah 60:3 states in this regard: ìNations will come to your light, And kings to the brightness of your rising.î
Isaiah 49:6-7 along with 62:1-2 suggest the same type of ministry for Israel. The Lord expected Gentile leaders to take notice of His chosen people, a nation set apart for His purposes. Yet, the only way this would happen is if Israel pursued some form of evangelistic ministry to them. However, in an overall historical sense:
ISRAEL FAILED IN HER MINISTRY TO THE FOREIGN NATIONS AND THEIR LEADERS. HOWEVER, THE OLD TESTAMENT DOES PROVIDE SEVERAL EXAMPLES WHERE GODíS PEOPLE ACTUALLY OBEYED
One illustration of Israelís obedience to Yahwehís calling to reach political leaders is the Queen of Sheba, when she visits Israel during the reign of Solomon (cf. 1Kings 10:1-9). The queen had traveled a distance of 1,400 miles to see the splendorous city of Jerusalem ó she would not leave disappointed. 1Kings 10:5 says that as a result of the visit, there was no more breath in her, (ESV, an OT euphemistic phrase similar to the one today, ìshe was simply blown away!î). The queen was overwhelmed and proceeded, as a result, to praise the Lord (cf. 1Kings 10:9). Luke 11:31 implies that during this time, she was converted. The point is plain to see: Solomonís testimony (up to this time) proved compelling as he evangelized this foreign leader.
A second illustration of Israelís obedi≠ence to her calling to reach political leaders from Gentile nations is when Solomon finished the temple. He gave thanks to God. During his thanksgiving prayer, he reminded Israel that the Lord blessed them for a purpose, ìso that all the peoples of the earth may know that the LORD is God; there is no one elseî (1Kings 8:60). The temple itself even included a court for the Gentiles to worship Yahweh in keeping with the purpose of proclaiming God to the na≠tions. As the nations saw Israelís light, the hope was that, like the Queen of Sheba, they would come from afar, led by their kings, to worship the God of Israel. States Isaiah 60:11 in this regard: ìYour gates will be open continually; They will not be closed day or night, So that men may bring to you the wealth of the nations, With their kings led in procession.î
The thanksgiving prayer over the temple illustrates too that God wanted Israel to be magnetically attractive to Gentile nations and their leaders.
This idea is further illustrated, yet again in yet another way, by the prophetic ministry of Jonah. Though a reluctant Jewish minister, Jonah eventually went (in a ìwhaleî of a round-about way) to the Gentile city of Nineveh and called upon its citizens to repent of their wickedness. Many listened, and soon Jonah had the opportunity to call the king to repentance. He, too, listened and then ordered the entire city to follow suit in a very profound passage of Scripture (cf. Jonah 3:3-9).
Summarily, as illustrated by the three aforementioned passages, Israel possessed a great calling to reach the nations of the world with Yahwehís glory ó and an important aspect of that was to reach the leaders of those Gentile nations.
In addition to the previously seen mission illustrated by Paul and the three examples within Old Testament Israel, when Jesus commissioned His twelve disciples, He told them they would be ìbrought before governors and kings for [His] sake as a testimony to themÖî (Matthew 10:18). Accordingly, He sent His disciples out with a charge to evangelize political leaders.
As a crescendo to the various politically-related conversions in the book of Acts as mentioned earlier, remember that Paul sought to minister to Caesar and his household by visiting Rome. And in magnum opus fashion, He desired to visit Spain to preach the gospel to leaders residing there (cf. Rom. 15:23- 24). Therefore Paulís subsequent charge to Timothy (1Timothy 2:1-4) (as previously noted in the study) and Titus (Titus 3:1) underscore the importance of carrying forth this mandate today in the Church Age.
Paul however was not the only Apostle embedded with a passion to minister to kings; Peter had the same aspirations, albeit evidenced not quite as directly.
In 1Peter 2:12, Peter exhorted his audience to live exemplary lives amongst the Gentiles for one purpose: that they may glorify God in the day of visitation. This Petrine language is his way of saying that he desired that Gentiles who they came into contact with, be saved: to see Gentiles come to know Christ. He knew that poor conduct in the church would lead to a poor testimony in the community and that such would stand in the way, i.e. such poor conduct would ruin their testimony.
Interestingly, verses 13 and 14 of 1Peter 2, expand upon this idea with respect and specificity to political leaders. Simply and summarily stated, evangelism to Gentile kings and governors will only be effective to the degree that believers humbly submit themselves to them and the laws they enact (so long as they are not patently unbiblical of course). So, when we read 1Peter 2:13 -14: Submit yourself therefore, for the Lordís sake to every human institution, whether to a king as one in authority, or to governors as sent by HimÖ.
It is set in the context ó the reason for such submission to lawmakers ó is for the main purpose of being a good witness to them. This insight is usually not gleaned from this text, but nonetheless it is important to the thesis of this Bible study
During the Olivet Discourse in Mark 13, Jesus taught on events that would unfold during the tribulation. Wars will erupt, natural disasters will occur, and persecution will be common for Christís followers. Mark 13:9 concludes this description by adding: ìBut be on your guard, for they will deliver you to the courts, and you will be flogged in the synagogues, and you will stand before governors and kings for My sake, as a testimony to them.î
I hope we are raptured before this my friend, and if we are, and I believe that followers of Christ will be rapture before then, that it is those who come to Christ during the Tribulation who are being spoken about here, and that they will be the witnesses to governing leaders who are being referred to.
IT IS INTERESTING THAT AMONGST THE LIMITED DETAILS JESUS PROVIDED REGARDING THE TRIBULATION, HE MADE SPECIFIC MENTION OF EVANGELIZING POLITICAL LEADERS
That is a worthy point to make. Mark 13:9 states that believers ìwill stand before governors and kings for My sake, as a testimony to them.î Thus, the thread of ministry to those in the political arena continues even during this future epoch of great upheaval.
Subsequent to Christís Second Coming, Godís people will no longer minister to kings for they will become kings themselves (cf. 2Timothy 2:12; Revelation 5:10, 20:4, 6). Those who have been redeemed will be given the privilege to rule on earth. When Christ returns and His Kingdom has come, He will grant believers the governing positions similar to those who hold them today. Believers will then rule with perfection under the authority of ìthe King of Kings.î The perfect political leadership by Christ and His called-out ones is a characteristic lacking in all the prior political leaders in todayís fallen world (cf. Gen. 3). Praise God for the future day!
The type of ministry will change ó from one of pursuing to one of being ó but Godís keen interest in governmental leaders will nonetheless remain intact even during the Millennial Kingdom.
The Great Commission includes a specific, and I believe strategic element of emphasis in reaching political leaders throughout the world with the Gospel of Jesus Christ. This insight becomes quite evident and important from the passages examined in this study. Capitol Ministries is a missional response to this mandate. We welcome your partnership in this God-specified calling! Are you pursuing what is foremost important ó protos ó relative to the fulfillment of the Great Commission?
Learn more at Capmin.org!